[sebhc] H8 Emulator update
Dave Dunfield
dave04a at dunfield.com
Sun May 30 11:31:55 CDT 2004
Hi Stevem.
>>I've provided ... a bootable HDOS disk image in the file HDOS16.H8D.
>Why not provide HDOS 2.0 instead? It's the last of the (Heath) HDOS
>releases.
Two reasons: 1) The HDOS1.6 disk has the assembler on it (as well as edit
and BASIC) - since the disks are big I don't want to have to include too
many of them. 2) The HDOS 2.0 drivers have the softare timing loop issue
which prevents booting it in "bat out of heck" mode.
>>You can use the /I command option force the simulator to ignore the bad
>>instruction,...
>
>Does it still just ignore? Or does it cause all opcodes to behave like a
>real 8080? (like the other codes for jmp, ret, call, etc). It would be
>nice to have a "real 8080" mode if /I doesn't do it.
Not currently - it's doable, but why are you so concerned about invalid
opcodes? - I won't think this should be an issue (except of course for the
HASL thing - which is a NOP in disguise). Did Heath use the other undoced
opcodes?
>(and you're missing the word "to" between "option" and "force")
Thanks.
>>!PAM-8 GO monitor
>>S123000011F903210A20C33B00CD5A001600C38100CD5A001AC3A401C325202618C3230030
>>S1230020C328206BE30ED2E9C32B20F5AFC36302C32E203ED0C39D01C331201A772B1CC292
>>...
>
>This format is different from the other .HEX's. I don't recognize it, what
>is it?
It's Motorola hex download format - My tools (and H8) accept either format,
and produce either, however Motorola format by default due to the fact that
I've spent a lot more time working with Motorola MCU's, and also I think it's
a bit cleaner.
Regards,
Dave--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Vintage computing equipment collector.
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
--
Delivered by the SEBHC Mailing List
More information about the Sebhc
mailing list