[sebhc] Soft or Hard?

[Carroll Waddell]

What I meant was, why use a hard sector controller at all. Didn't Heath 
make a soft sector controller? Why not use (or remanufacture) that?




Steve Thatcher wrote:

>the reason this whole thing started was to be able to use soft sector disks in a hard sector controller. The only reason to do that was to be able to use disks that are easier to come by.
>
>I am not aware of any soft sector controllers (1771, 1793, 765, 8272, etc) that can be told to read hard sector formatted disks. The hard sector holes were used to mark a position on disk to read and write on. In a soft sectored format, data is written across an entire track when you format a disk. When you go to write on a specific sector, the controller actually reads the sector info off the track in order to find and then the write at the proper position.
>
>best regards, Steve Thatcher
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carroll Waddell <CarrollWaddell at sc.rr.com>
>Sent: Jun 30, 2004 2:17 PM
>To: sebhc <sebhc at sebhc.org>
>Subject: [sebhc] Soft or Hard?
>
>I wonder if it wouldn't just be easier to use the soft sector controller 
>that Heath made for the H8 / H89.
>Am I missing the point? Why try to fool the H17 into thinking that a 
>soft sector is a hard sector.
>CEW
>--
>Delivered by the SEBHC Mailing List
>
>--
>Delivered by the SEBHC Mailing List
>
>  
>

--
Delivered by the SEBHC Mailing List