[sebhc] Different HASL8 - Same bug
sp11 at hotmail.com
Mon May 17 10:06:36 CDT 2004
Dave Dunfield said:
>I was able to
>load the HASL8 from the tapes that Jack gave me ... It's an older
>version (#4.01.01) than the one from Carrol (#4.05.00), but it
>has the SAME BUG!
That is too funny! I wonder how it was coded in source to make the address
reference off by one after compilation.
>you will need to use the /I option
>with my emulator to run HASL-8 (Perhaps I should make this the
My preference for the default behavior would be to emulate all opcodes just
like a real chip would. Do you still have me previous message where I
listed all the codes and functions?
>The only one I know I won't be able to load is EXBASIC, as it
>requires 12k and I have only 8.
You could write a little program to read from the tape and output it in hex
or octal to the console, and capture it on your pc "on the fly".
>Finally ... Is anyone actually using/testing my emulator? - I haven't
>gotten any feedback since the very first publication.
It's truly amazing for just a few day's development - your extensive
experience in emulators is clearly showing! I tried out most of the
cassette software. I think what will really get folks excited is when it
Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com
Delivered by the SEBHC Mailing List
More information about the Sebhc